Europe’s Massive Hashish Bust… Morocco Flagged as the Command Center of Drug Networks Copy link

Algeria Gate: Orange Morocco has yielded to pressure and decided to remove its advertisement on the Spanish AP-7 motorway, on the stretch linking Elche to Valencia, after the ad featured a fictitious map incorporating Western Sahara into Moroccan territory.

The decision followed an official complaint filed by the Polisario Front’s representative in Spain, Abdullah Al-Arabi, objecting to the content of the advertisement that appeared on the highway.

According to available information, the advertising campaign will be removed in the coming days. Sources clarified that the advertisement belongs to Orange Morocco and is not connected to the Spanish company MasOrange.

The incident thus reveals that the colonial map Morocco seeks to market as a fait accompli no longer passes muster; even Europe’s roads no longer tolerate Moroccan propaganda of annexation of Western Sahara. What is rejected politically and legally cannot be turned into reality simply by drawing it on a map.

Algeria Gate: Spanish authorities have arrested a Moroccan migrant on suspicion of deliberately starting a large wildfire on the outskirts of Barcelona that burned approximately 54 hectares of forest.

The blaze forced the evacuation of dozens of residents and required the deployment of numerous firefighting vehicles and personnel to bring it under control.

According to reports, when interrogated by Spanish security services and confronted with evidence and documented eyewitness testimonies, the suspect claimed he had heard voices ordering him to set the fires.

Spanish media indicate that ongoing investigations are expected to uncover further details about the incident. Questions have also been raised in some quarters about whether the act may have any connection to Moroccan intelligence services, though no such link has been established.

The case continues to develop as Spanish authorities pursue their inquiries.

Algeria Gate: Sonia Mabrouk did not need long to prove that switching from CNews to BFMTV only changed the studio address. The compass of her discourse on Algeria remained exactly the same. From her first appearance on the new channel, the Franco-Tunisian journalist slipped back into the familiar register that reduces Algeria to a permanent, ready-made adversary; summoned whenever needed, accused before the facts are even examined.

Former Algerian diplomat Amar Belani did not let this professional freefall pass. He dismantled Mabrouk’s method and concluded that her bias is no longer a debatable editorial choice. It has hardened into a fixed approach: blame Algeria first, insert it systematically into a charged political narrative, and, when convenient, recycle false claims without hesitation.

Belani’s intervention comes as Mabrouk launches her daily programme 100% Mabrouk on BFMTV, occupying the prime 18:50–21:00 slot five evenings a week. Le Monde called the hire a costly gamble to claw back audience share ahead of the 2027 presidential election. Two full hours in one of French television’s most influential windows is not a journalistic assignment; it is a political investment.

The real problem, Belani stresses, is not a journalist changing channels. It is the cargo she brought with her: a discourse that treats Algeria as electoral raw material and as an external enemy useful for stirring the French right whenever ratings or a political deadline demand it. “Her bias, like that of several figures manufactured inside CNews, is no longer merely an editorial orientation; it has become a fixed method,” Belani observed. As the presidential race draws nearer, the timing of this discourse becomes even more revealing. Algeria is never invited onto these sets to explain its positions or to illuminate the complexity of bilateral relations. It is wheeled out as the permanent televisual villain, already guilty before the first question is asked.

Belani goes straight to the core: is this still journalism, or has it become “permanent score-settling”? Real journalism starts with facts, balances evidence, grants the right of reply, and keeps preconceived verdicts out of the studio. Turning Algeria into a standing defendant and building every exchange on accusatory premises is not investigation. It is the deliberate manufacture of public prejudice.

Mabrouk left CNews and Europe 1 in February 2026, yet she arrived at BFMTV carrying more than a decade of baggage accumulated inside Vincent Bolloré’s media empire. Even before her programme went on air, the Association of BFMTV Journalists publicly reminded management that the channel is supposed to rest on “facts and field reporting before opinions,” and that independence, neutrality and non-partisan treatment of information are non-negotiable. French journalists themselves sounded the alarm about the risk of importing CNews-style polarisation. The speed with which Mabrouk returned to targeting Algeria shows that a change of logo was never going to produce a change of method.

Her formal exit from CNews has not severed her ties to the Bolloré cultural sphere either. Since 2025 she has directed the “Pensée libre” imprint at Fayar; another Bolloré asset that has become a preferred publishing platform for figures of the French right and far right, from Jordan Bardella and Philippe de Villiers to Éric Ciotti and Alain de Benoist. These connections do not automatically falsify every word she utters, but they destroy any pretence of neutral arrival on BFMTV. Professionalism demands a clear line between news and personal conviction. Mabrouk’s relentless drive to drag Algeria into the dock proves that the conviction was already written before the questions began.

This style of discourse intensifies as presidential elections approach. Rather than hold French politicians accountable for economic and social failure at home, it is cheaper and more rewarding to hunt for an external scapegoat. Algeria fits the role perfectly in the right-wing imagination: immigration, memory, visas, security, the diaspora, sovereignty; every file is twisted until Algeria appears as the origin of the problem, no matter how much more complicated the reality is.

The political interview is thereby emptied of its proper function. Instead of interrogating French power, the studio becomes a stage for recycling an unresolved colonial complex. Independent, sovereign Algeria refuses the role of a former colony still expected to take orders from Paris. When it rejects that subordinate status, the microphone becomes a weapon of media punishment.

The contradiction is glaring. Mabrouk waves the banner of French sovereignty while bristling at Algerian sovereignty. She demands protection of French national interests while treating Algeria’s defence of its own interests as provocation. She celebrates independent decision-making in Paris yet expects Algiers to accept the place of the obedient junior partner. These are not mere double standards. They are the residual reflexes of a colonial mindset that regards sovereignty as a French privilege and any Algerian exercise of it as unacceptable insolence.

Algeria requires neither a certificate of good behaviour from Sonia Mabrouk nor a green light from BFMTV to defend its interests, its memory, its diaspora or its national choices. President Abdelmadjid Tebboune is not measured by the approval of Parisian studios. He is measured by his capacity to protect Algerian sovereignty and to conduct a balanced relationship with France; free of both the coloniser’s nostalgia and the former colonised’s submission.

Belani therefore places the issue in its proper frame. The objection is not to a French journalist’s right to criticise Algeria. It is to the conversion of criticism into a machine of permanent accusation, of questioning into a pre-arranged trial, of opinion into manufactured news, and of Algeria into an electoral scapegoat. A journalist may ask the hardest questions. The moment she decides the answers in advance and only invites the guest to decorate a ready-made verdict, she ceases to practise journalism.

BFMTV, having bet on Mabrouk to recover its audience before 2027, now faces an early test. Either it defends its declared commitment to facts and neutrality, or it allows a second CNews to take root inside its own studios. A channel can purchase a name and hand it two hours every evening. It cannot purchase credibility once an entire country is reduced to cheap fuel in the war for ratings.

When a nation becomes a regular target of suspicion and blame, when its president is dragged into French domestic quarrels that have nothing to do with the questions on the table, and when condemnation systematically replaces proof, this is no longer “combative journalism.” It is political activism wearing a television mask, packaging prejudice as news.

Belani’s verdict is final: “As for journalism in its professional sense, it does not appear to have much connection with this approach.” That single sentence captures the entire problem. The issue is not the sharpness of the question. It is the total absence of distance between the journalist and her hostility, between information and campaign, between the screen and the score-settling. Sonia Mabrouk has changed channels. Her discourse on Algeria remains locked inside the Bolloré studios; same accusations, same designated enemy, same confusion between journalism and political vendetta.