Slimane Boussoufa, “the Mercenary,” Under Heavy Fire from Algerian Journalists
Algeria Gate: Former Hespress and France 24 journalist Slimane Boussoufa has provoked widespread fury among Algerian journalists both inside the country and abroad.
His coverage of the Ceuta events has been condemned as unprofessional, crude, and driven by a clear anti-Algerian agenda laced with personal revenge.
Two heavyweights of Algerian media Mourad Chebine and Mustapha Bounif have led the charge.
Mourad Chebine’s Brutal Professional Lesson
Mourad Chebine, the iconic face of Algerian television in the 1990s and a former senior figure at Sky News Arabia, delivered a masterclass in journalistic ethics without ever naming Boussoufa the classic method of heavyweights who refuse to elevate the unworthy.
He opened with a series of devastating questions:

“Is press freedom the right to cross the sea hunting for ‘harraga’ from your own country among tens of thousands of Moroccans who stormed Ceuta?
Is freedom of expression the right to threaten someone with exposing their private secrets simply because they disagree with your political stance?

Is it freedom to publish dubious information about a case still before the courts in order to steer public opinion or influence the course of justice?
Has lying become a point of view, blackmail investigative journalism, defamation courage, and the violation of privacy a right?”
Chebine continued with uncompromising clarity:
“These questions do not require lengthy answers.
They require a constant reminder that freedom is not a privilege without limits.
Journalism is not built by turning platforms into courts, nor by using people’s reputations and private lives as fuel for scoops and sensationalism.

Freedom of expression does not mean inventing facts, spreading lies, manufacturing hatred, forging images and documents, or exploiting information for blackmail.”
He concluded with a line that cuts deep:
“These are not restrictions invented by any authority to muzzle journalists.
They are the most basic foundations of a press that understands its mission.
Professional ethics are not measured by what others do, but by what we ourselves have sworn to respect.
Governments change, laws change, balances of power shift.
One thing must never change: a journalist does not derive the honour of the profession from how far he is willing to go, but from how much he deliberately chooses not to cross.

There are lines that, once crossed, do not merely bring down journalism — they destroy the very meaning for which freedom was created.”
Chebine’s post was met with near-unanimous support from fellow journalists.
Mustapha Bounif Delivers the Final Blow
Influential journalist Mustapha Bounif finished the job with a video that leaves little room for escape.
He asked Boussoufa a simple, devastating question: where is the proof that the young man he interviewed in Ceuta was actually Algerian?

The man’s accent was unmistakably Moroccan.
The T-shirt he was wearing carried the word
“Casablanca” in Latin letters.
Bounif forced viewers to confront the obvious: why would an Algerian “harraga” wear a shirt bearing the name of a Moroccan city?
And would that detail have worked in his favour if Spain had decided to send him back with the rest of the group?
Boussoufa, it seems, never noticed.
A Journalist Against His Own Country
There is a reason this kind of coverage is possible.

When Moroccan authorities grant an Algerian journalist access to cover such a sensitive event on their soil, it is rarely an act of journalistic neutrality.
Boussoufa’s earlier work for Hespress between 2008 and 2010 particularly his articles on communal tensions in Algeria already revealed a pattern of extreme hostility.
A journalist from the Mozabite community of Ghardaïa who left Algeria and then used hostile foreign platforms (Moroccan and French) to pour fuel on internal divisions is not a common occurrence.
In Boussoufa’s case, it appears unique.
There is a clear difference between a professional journalist and an unethical one.
The professional works within the rules, without tricks.
The other needs a certain cunning to obscure the absence of ethics and to confuse the public.
But that cunning rarely fools actual professionals.
In this case, it did not




